The 10 reasons not to subscribe to Free

5 Comments for "The 10 reasons not to subscribe to Free"

1. Alain says:

   24 January 2012 at 18 h 55 I

   I do not see what's so funny in this article… ???
2. Loni Langlet says:

   24 January 2012 at 19 h 11 I

   That you did not follow the news on free time…
   On 10 “arguments”, half are completely irrelevant, the rest are a little less but are equally critical.
   I copy here the comment I made under section :

   Uh by cons I say that I say nothing, but from the point 1 is completely false. You make your request for RIO, but you find yourself not “the high and dry without any operator”, the portability of the line is chosen by free once the RIO is obtained, they will not tell you “I'll cut your line even if I shall return in 15 days”. You'll have maximum 1/2 day without a phone if merdent between sending SIM / porting line. But then recorded cases are very rare…

   2 : With the extra fee that you paid before other operators in + the fact that the phone € 1 were very often in shit that were just 1/10th of what we could imagine the last smartphone, the final no you not pay that expensive, it is even about the same. Anyway the last pay € 700 iPhone naked SFR, or pay € 700 in free, knowing that whatever is € 600 on the Apple site…

   3 : in this case there is the package for free € 2, but it would have made a good argument in less then had to put as what “The free package is not suitable” everyone.

   4 : it's 3 points we're talking about iPhone… it's not supposed eternal record on free ??! To see the price above argument, you pay the same price almost naked with another operator. Yeah they must make a line somewhere…

   5 : Except that initially just wanted to make a free package available to everyone, not to charge € 50 for one hour call. Indeed, if a phone is preferred to watch TV instead of calling, as a package to orange then to 40 €

   6 : “Why go home when your service Free low offer you the same offer.” Just the fact of being pigeons for so many years, and say “oh yeah now they are the same price, but why they have not done before ?” simply because they could do so as they did. So I see no reason why I would continue to give them, if only the minimum.

   7 : Oh yeah and the argument “free ouvre 200 stores by the end of the year”, he had to fall by the wayside, JSZ or read only what interests may be ?

   8 : if you go abroad every 15 of the month, together, we will not ride with a free package for € 20 in suspecting that it will not be free 4 around the world.

   9 : the 3 million subscribers to make it a “test grandeur nature”, see if their prices are adjusted, they still fall back on their feet. A mind that the package will not move for them even if it is set to increase after this “test” (This would be surprising given that others are aligned).

   10 : “So, if you are an advocate of diversity, not subscribe to Free Mobile would feed her.” LOL ! It is on that if I choose, I'd rather pay double story that another company does not care their pockets. Frankly we would not find tape that closes and opens ? And even if there would be Orange and free, What would change ? Ben Shaking even more in, so it would be a more rapid development of future technologies …? Ah, but I'm not stupid, better to be champion of diversity.
3. Amin - From Thailand says:

   19 March 2012 at 15 h 21 I

   Honestly I know many people who are thrown on the launch Free, and now regret …

   In hindsight I think I did well to stay home Sosh
4. Marcel says:

   16 April 2012 at 15 h 18 I

   Ce sont les commentaires qui sont amusants ici
   Il paraît qu’il vaut mieux être chez B&You, vous en pensez quoi ?
5. Loo says:

   18 April 2012 at 15 h 47 I

   Je pense que Frree est trés bien, pas de quoi rire franchement.